This letter was sent by one of our co-ordinators to our local MP on the urgent and worrying issues facing our hospital. We'll publish the response as soon as we have it.
John Penrose
MP
House of
Commons
SW1A 0AA
Thank you for your letter of 14th August.
I anticipated that we might have to have a discussion of the meaning of
the word franchise. A franchise is a formal agreement for someone to sell a
brand’s products or services in a particular place, in exchange for a payment
or part of the profits, and/or it is a right granted to an individual or group
by a public authority, such as the right to use public property for a business.
Clearly “franchise” refers
to a business arrangement. It follows therefore that what could happen to Weston Hospital is a symptom
that health care there (and by precedent, everywhere in the UK) is making a
transition from being a service (as in National Health Service), to a
business arrangement, where a product is sold to customers by a private health
corporation, who pay for the product first via their taxes, and later on, no
doubt, by some form of insurance.
If Weston is franchised out to a private health corporation, it is taking, inescapably and indisputably, a step in the direction of privatisation, even if you would deny or question that what is happening is an explicit and complete example of a privatisation.
If Weston is franchised out to a private health corporation, it is taking, inescapably and indisputably, a step in the direction of privatisation, even if you would deny or question that what is happening is an explicit and complete example of a privatisation.
So I must ask you – will you
accept that franchise is at least a step in the direction of privatization?
The second question that I
would put to you is – how can it be more efficient in cash terms for a private
contractor to provide a product for the NHS, given
· The turmoil and administrative work associated with
granting the franchise, this present correspondence being an infinitesimally
small part of this process?
· The fact that a private corporation’s primary
responsibility is to make sure that their shareholders get a bigger dividend
each year?
· The fact that generous salaries and bonuses must be
paid to the directors of the private company?
· The fact that the company is very likely to pay large
fees to tax accountants in order to minimize or annihilate the amount of tax
that they will pay in the UK?
Please explain how this can
come about.
Third, I would like to put
to you again a point I made in my previous letter. Several Cabinet members have
financial stakes in private health corporations. Please tell me the exact
number of Cabinet Ministers who have such financial interests, their names and
their interests, and then tell me whether or not, in your view, their financial
interests will influence their decisions regarding the way in which the future
of Weston Hospital and the NHS will be handled?
Fourth, do you agree that Kathy Headdon should resign from her post on
the North Somerset Clinical Commissioning Group on grounds of conflict of
interest since she is also a consultant for Capita Symonds Ltd and her husband
is on the board of UHB?
Finally, I would be grateful if you will ensure that Serco is required
to withdraw its interest in the Weston franchise on the grounds that Serco is
under investigation for fraud.
Many thanks for your time
and trouble in answering these five questions.
No comments:
Post a Comment